On 10/15/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Bob Blakely" > > > I assume you believe you have rights. Are they valuable to you? If > > someone deprives you of a right, don't you feel harmed in some way > > even if what you lost (control over actions on your property) did not > > cause any monetary loss? Such a thing should be a cause for a civil > > suit, if for no other reason than to secure your right. In such a > > case, I have no problem with a court finding $0 for damages, but > > still assigning such punitave awards as is necessary to dissuade the > > person (and others) from usurping your rights or the rights of > > others. > > > The problem here is there has been no loss of rights by the plaintiff; > no infringement of the plaintiff's rights. There is no damage to the > plaintiff. > > The land in question is [was] opened to public use (e.g. tourism). The > photographer did no trespass in taking the photos, even without specific > permission.
Even better excuse to buy a 600 and tele and hide in the bushes.:-) Dave > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
