BBEdit is superb. I miss it (Running a Vista system as my main box right now, 
need to get another Mac).

-Adam


P. J. Alling wrote:
> Sorry my text editor of choice is KEdit, a windows version of XEdit. 
> Extensible using REX, (I think I have a REX manual around here 
> somewhere), a language that is one understandable by mere mortals and 
> doesn't lead me to trying to rewrite the editor entirely, so I actually 
> get some work done.
> 
> Gonz wrote:
>> Then you need to run M-x doctor.
>>  (ever tried that?)
>> :)
>>
>> On 10/16/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   
>>> Now I know I'm in the twilight zone...
>>>
>>> Gonz wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Exactly.  I frequently run into situations where making very
>>>> sophisticated edits to extremely large and complex files would have
>>>> been impossible in any other editor (especially the practially useless
>>>> vi).  Emacs rules.  I have a large library of Lisp emacs extensions
>>>> for dozens of special needs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/16/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>> But it's extensible using LISP, how could that be bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam Maas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Actually it's just ingrained muscle memory, years of having to use vi
>>>>>> while maintaining services on Unix machines means that the basic editing
>>>>>> commands are pretty much automatic. vi is ideal for that use, it's
>>>>>> lightweight and everything has it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still :wq on a regular basis in just about every other editor/word
>>>>>> processor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want punishment, use emacs. All the weight of Word, none of the
>>>>>> Eye Candy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> You are a glutton for punishment...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam Maas wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> I use vi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>>> Always the odd one out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>> It'll likely be a matter of attrition.  What % of people here use
>>>>>>>>> WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll bet it's a 5/95 ratio if not higher.  Not too different from 
>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>> Pentax stands in the market, despite some recent relative success 
>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>> K10D.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your suppositions are probably correct.  When I say done for, I'm not
>>>>>>>>> predicting when... I'm saying that inevitable market forces will 
>>>>>>>>> finally
>>>>>>>>> take their toll, unless something changes quickly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under 
>>>>>>>>>> NDA) ?
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why? Pentax has never been a player in the Pro 35mm market. Not being
>>>>>>>>>> one now will make little difference.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I expect to see them bring out a body above the K10D within the next 
>>>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>>>> months, or a K10D 'successor' that is little more than the new Sony 
>>>>>>>>>> 12MP
>>>>>>>>>> sensor and a new shutter in the K10D body, perhaps with a higher
>>>>>>>>>> framerate. I don't expect to see a Pentax body above the $1300 or so
>>>>>>>>>> price point.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL.  You're not breaking it to me.  I was being kind. :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pentax has a slim chance yet to recover.  If they blow it in the 
>>>>>>>>>>> next 6
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> - 12
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>> months though, I susect they are done for.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: "pdml" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NDA) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:59:17 -0400
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I hate to break it to you, but in the USA, Pentax *is* a "2nd tier
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> camera
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>> company".  The company hasn't released a truly professional system
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> camera
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>> here (or anywhere, actually) since the LX.  The current high-end 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pentax
>>>>>>>>>>>> lens
>>>>>>>>>>>> selection is miniscule compared to Canon and Nikon.  Pentax does 
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of professional support that Canon and Nikon do at major
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> sporting
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>> events.  Pentax products lack presence on store shelves in the USA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> Etc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "John Sessoms"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>> NDA)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If memory serves the other two are an over-priced Nissan and an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over-priced Honda.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that depends on what your personal comfort is worth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> William Robb
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perception in the market place.  Sure a FF DSLR will cost more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one with an APS-C size sensor.  If the Canons, Nikon's,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sony's of the world offer FF DSLR's, then Pentax must also.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they do not, they will relegate themselves to a 2nd
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tier camera company, and it doesn't matter who loves their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> camera, or how much it satisfies their current needs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>           
>>>>> --
>>>>> Remember, it's pillage then burn.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>       
>>> --
>>> Remember, it's pillage then burn.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>>     
>>   
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to