Not possible, of course, but I'd like to have a way to guarantee that
everyone should critique without having read others.
I imagine there are some who will not comment 'til they first have had
a chance to check what's being written.
I will intentionally avoid reading critiques prior to writing and
sending mine. Gives me a the tiniest (probably false) sense of
integrity. :) In my case, a very rare thing.

Jack


--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's the only way we grow, right. ;-)
> 
> If I tell you a mediocre image is great, you may just keep on taking 
> mediocre images thinking they're great.  I may be kind, but I'm doing
> you a 
> disservice... and vice-versa of course. ;-)
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: Cut or Keep? A Question About Editing
> >Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >In the future, I'll be especially eager to read your comments re my
> >stuff. <grin>
> >
> >Jack
> >
> >--- ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Tom C wrote:
> > >
> > > >If someone is sharing an image out of camaraderie it's one
> thing.
> > > In that
> > > >case the person is likely not expecting feedback about the
> image,
> > > but
> > > >possibly just about the subject, as when I displayed the photos
> of
> > > the
> > > >chihuahua.  It seems though that almost every image is viewed as
> > > >exceptional.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >One must also take into consideration the experience of the one
> > > making the
> > > >comments.   Perceptions and the ability to view critically grow
> with
> > > time.
> > > >Images that I once thought were very good, now present glaring
> > > deficiencies
> > > >when I view them. They may have been the best I had done at the
> > > time, but in
> > > >hindsight I see they were not a good as I once thought.
> > > >
> > > >Tom C.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the opposite happens occasionally too.... one reason I
> never
> > > literally toss stuff I've done
> > > even if I think it is lousy work :)
> > >
> > > Now and then I find something in my archives taht I think is
> worth
> > > something and I chose a different
> > > negative to print... I might find myself liking the one a
> rejected
> > > years
> > > ago better than the one I chose as
> > > what I thought had the most promise.
> > >
> > > In terms of  commenting on others here, I generally give a nod to
> > > those
> > > I enjoy but if I feel I can help by
> > > serious critquing I tend to do that off list...
> > >
> > > IF something really sucks I keep my fingers off the keyboard :)
> > >
> > > ann
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > > >>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > > >>Subject: Re: Cut or Keep?  A Question About Editing
> > > >>Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:10:48 -0600
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > >>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>
> > > >>Subject: Re: Cut or Keep? A Question About Editing
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>In a message dated 10/15/2007 9:24:08 P.M.  Pacific Daylight
> Time,
> > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > >>>And stop posting pictures  here, because you won't get an
> accurate
> > >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>opinion
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>about what is good from this  list.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>William Robb
> > > >>>
> > > >>>===============
> > > >>>I beg to differ. Only  someone who showed his own photos on
> list
> > > so
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>rarely
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>would think this.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Chicken or egg, dear?
> > > >>When I see people who indiscriminately praise everything thats
> > > posted,
> > > >>whether tepid or otherwise, I tend to lose respect for the
> entire
> > > process.
> > > >>Rather than damning with faint praise, which does no good at
> all,
> > > perhaps
> > > >>it
> > > >>would be more honest to call spades what they are.
> > > >>Often, this list is little more than a circle jerk when it
> comes to
> > > >>reviewing pictures. It's a nice, warm and happy place, and I
> > > appreciate
> > > >>that
> > > >>people need that in their lives, but the best way to improve
> your
> > > pictures
> > > >>is to have it ruthlessly picked apart, and have the failings of
> the
> > > picture
> > > >>pointed out. Unfortunately, when people do that, they tend to
> get
> > > spat on.
> > > >>
> > > >>I don't post a lot of photos at the moment because most of my
> > > photography
> > > >>right now is client based for the studio I am working for, and
> I'm
> > > not
> > > >>bothering with securing permission to show the stuff. My work
> is
> > > selling,
> > > >>and making money, I don't need praise beyond that.
> > > >>
> > > >>We can agree to disagree on this one, I won't think less of you
> for
> > > it, and
> > > >>I hope you'll feel the same way.
> > > >>
> > > >>William Robb
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > >>[email protected]
> > > >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > >>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
> above
> > > and
> > > >>follow the directions.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
> above
> > > and follow the directions.
> > >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >--
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to