----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Pentax Optio Digital Camera - YUH take into account the sorry shadow detail
> In a message dated 11/12/01 7:09:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, > ***With digital paper costing an arm and leg, and having to sometimes print > three-four-five "tests" to get one "good" print, who says digital is > "comparable" in costs to chemical prints? With chemical prints of course, one > uses test strips but one 8x10 film sheet will yield seven or eight strips. You are in a unique position where you can do your own colour printing. If a person has to pay 15 bucks or more for a custom wet print, the digital prints suddenly make a lot of economic sense. I can make a good quality photograph on my computer for about 1/4 the cost of having the same print made by a custom lab. > The worse thing about digital? It utterly fills up your hard drive with all > these images you will never use but somehow feel an obligation to keep. I > finally went through my HDD(s), purged them of images I would not need or use > and gained back 1.6 GIG of space! Next, I'm setting my Norton > SystemWorks2001 on the rest of the computer, purging all duplicate image > files. Thats what CD burners were invented for. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
