On 2007-10-19, at 21:20, Mark Roberts wrote: > I've heard that it was designed as a D-FA lens for full-frame coverage > (but "optimized" for digital with the latest anti-reflective coatings) > and the designation was changed to DA because it has no aperture ring. > > We'll see what the score is when it becomes available. On the very first roadmap it was marked as DFA lens similar to 300/4 and 200/2.8... Perhpas reason for delay is that they want to return to idea of making it DFA lenses and make it fully compatible with eventual FF body in the future?
Cheers, Sylwek -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
