No, that's exactly the opposite. The F-104 was a pure interceptor design 
(not even a fighter/interceptor). The only ground-attack variants were 
the CF-104 (pure highspeed nuclear strike initially) and F-104G (German 
multi-role version).

Strike aircraft need far more manoeverability than interceptors do. 
Fighters need something closer to a strike aircraft's manoeverability. 
The F-105 was the ground attack design from that era, not the F-104 
(which initially carried nothing beyond a gun, air-to-air missiles and a 
centreline fuel tank).

The F-104 was only procured in small numbers by the USAF due to the 
'manned interceptors are obsolete' thinking of the brass.

-Adam

graywolf wrote:
> The design role of the 104 was never air to air combat. It was designed as a 
> ground attack aircraft, not as an fighter/interceptor. It had no need for air 
> to 
> air combat capability as it could out run any fighter/interceptor in the 
> world 
> when it was introduced. Also It did not have the maneuverability a 
> fighter/interceptor needed. Yes, I know some small countries used it as an 
> fighter/interceptor, but that was because they were given the aircraft by, 
> guess 
> who, probably with the knowledge that if we ever needed to attack their 
> country 
> they would not be able to fight off our planes with it. The Air Force did not 
> see much need for air to air fighters in that period; on the other hand the 
> Navy 
> was heavily into air to air fighters as their perceived role was to fight off 
> air attacks on the fleets.
> 
> 
> mike wilson wrote:
>>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>>> Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
>>>
>>> Well, Canada did buy a bunch of F-104's. Too bad ours were low-level nuke 
>>> ground attack birds (Absolutely no air-to-air capability due to lacking a 
>>> gun prior to 1972 and a dedicated ground-attack radar instead of the normal 
>>> air-to-air set). We shoulda bought F-105 thuds instead.
>>>
>>> The CF-104 killed a lot of Canadians.  
>> Not to mention the Germans and Americans.  Should have gone for the EE 
>> Lightning.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
>> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
>>
>>
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to