Tom C wrote: > Certainly... I understand. Given that you could achieve your desired > results, would you opt for a lower or higher ISO? My guess is one usually > opts for the lowest ISO possible. > > For me personally, if I could get a FF DLSR that was great at ISO 200 - 800, > comparable to the same ISO film, and if it had higher ISO quality equivalent > to film at the same ISO, I'd be happy. > > Of course this is conjecture. We don't know if a FF body is imminent, what > sensor it will have, or how good it will be. > > Not trying to argue really. > > Tom C.
The quality you ask for is already there in the 200-800 range, FF or not. The only range that film still outperforms digital is at ISO 20-50 (Films like Adox CMS 20 and Velvia). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
