By all accounts, the K10D is a winner. I have both the K10D and the D. I never 
use the D unless I need a second camera for event shooting. The size 
differential is a plus for me. I find the D a bit too small for my hands and 
not sufficiently bulky to balance larger lenses.
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I could make that argument.  However it's not clear the K10d has too 
> many improvements, though at a price in size and weight.  I like the 
> size of the *ist-D and Ds.  If Pentax built a *ist-D follow on, (the 
> K10d is really a different beast entirely), or a *ist-Ds follow on, (the 
> K100/110 are more like DL follow ons), with 10mp sensors and a 
> pentaprism, with or without IS and the ability to use the new supersonic 
> focusing lenses, I think they'd have another winner. 
> 
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > I agree completely. I misread your earlier comment. I thought you  
> > said it was a better camera than a K10D.
> > Sorry.
> > Paul
> > On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Larger buffer better view finder, same sensor.  The Jpeg processing is
> >> more pleasing to those who're moving up from a P&S, but I doubt that
> >> you'd shoot Jpeg and who except a beginner would shoot Jpeg without
> >> setting up the camera to their liking.  You disagree?  Still obviously
> >> you want an argument so I guess you do.  By the way have you even  
> >> seen a
> >> K110D or it's direct ancestor the DL, let alone bought one? I  
> >> thought not.
> >>
> >> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Strange. Why is a Ds a better camera overall? Enlighten us.
> >>> Paul
> >>> On Oct 29, 2007, at 8:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>>> K110d's seem to be MIA, not available anywhere, but then again a
> >>>> used Ds
> >>>> or Ds2 sells for less and is a better camera overall.
> >>>>
> >>>> Adam Maas wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>>> I doubt it, from everything I've seen, Pentax has been shipping
> >>>>> K10D's
> >>>>> out to stores about as fast as they can get them in.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> K110D's on the other hand...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Adam
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tom C wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> I said alot more because the article said "Sales at the company,
> >>>>>> which also
> >>>>>> makes medical
> >>>>>> equipment rose 15 percent".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I suspect alot of those sub-$700 K10D's are in the writedown.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What is says to me is that while sales are up (good) and profit
> >>>>>> is up
> >>>>>> (good), due to the writedown, net income is down (bad).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tom C.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Pentax Inventory Writedown
> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:51:00 -0400
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tom C wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> Paraphrased from a 10/29 Bloomberg article:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Pentax Corp., said first-half profit fell 45 percent, missing
> >>>>>>>> its own
> >>>>>>>> estimate, after writing down the value of its inventory.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Net income declined to 600 million yen ($5.3 million) in the
> >>>>>>>> six months
> >>>>>>>> ended Sept. 30, lagging behind its July forecast of 1.4 billion
> >>>>>>>> yen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> Sales
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> at the company, which also makes medical
> >>>>>>>> equipment rose 15 percent.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "We have depreciated our inventory, including endoscopes, as we
> >>>>>>>> had
> >>>>>>>> difficulty competing with our rivals,'' mainly in North
> >>>>>>>> America, Jiro
> >>>>>>>> Okamura, a spokesman at the Tokyo-based company, said
> >>>>>>>> by telephone. The writedown led to a one-time loss of about 900
> >>>>>>>> million
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> yen,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> he said.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The company's sales rose to 85.6 billion yen from 74.7 billion
> >>>>>>>> yen.
> >>>>>>>> Operating profit, or sales minus the cost of goods sold and
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> administrative
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> expenses, more than doubled to 3.3 billion yen from
> >>>>>>>> 1.56 billion yen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ------------------
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe those bargain basement camera prices in N.A. aren't that
> >>>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> all.  Selling a lot more things that aren't worth as much.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tom C.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> That could explain the recent flood of Pentax refurbs that I've
> >>>>>>> seen here
> >>>>>>> in Canada. They're going cheap too. Lots of low-end MZ's, FA-J
> >>>>>>> lenses, and
> >>>>>>> a few DS's and DL's.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you write down inventory, you aren't talking about 'Selling a
> >>>>>>> lot more
> >>>>>>> things that aren't worth as much.', you're talking about excess
> >>>>>>> stock.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It sounds like Pentax wrote down a fair bit of older stuff they
> >>>>>>> were
> >>>>>>> sitting on (like the aforementioned cheap film kit) which
> >>>>>>> impacted their
> >>>>>>> net income. Otherwise the numbers look good, especially the
> >>>>>>> operating
> >>>>>>> profit increase.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Adam
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
> >>>>>>> above and
> >>>>>>> follow the directions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>           
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> The difference between individual intelligence and group
> >>>> intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the
> >>>> Harvard University football team.
> >>>>
> >>>>  -- P. J. O'Roark
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> >>>> and follow the directions.
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> -- 
> >> The difference between individual intelligence and group  
> >> intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the  
> >> Harvard University football team.
> >>
> >>    -- P. J. O'Roark
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> >> and follow the directions.
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
> difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football 
> team.
> 
>       -- P. J. O'Roark
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to