I have both those. Paid $50 each in 1990 in EX+ condition with original Pentax hard case, but it was a friend working in a photo/camera store that sold them to me out of the used case. Both saw a lot of use on my MX. The 135 seemed a nice portrait lens on a FF body... ;-) and the 200 was all I had for telephoto.
Both are solid lenses and given that you're going to lose the edges, probably better on digital. I need to get both out and start using them. Tom C. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Patrick Genovese > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:34 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Opinions re M135 f/3.5 AND M200 F/4 > > I've been offered the M135 f/3.5 and the M200 f/4 (price yet to be determined).. > > I''ve inspected the lenses and both are in great condition ... What''s > their performance like and what would be a reasonable price to pay for > them ? > > -- > Regards > > Patrick Genovese > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the > directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
