If you want the curvilinear rendering of a fish-eye, the 10-17 is quite nice.
10mm: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/39a.htm 17mm: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/39b.htm I use it occasionally for a change of pace. It's not too bulky. One of my photos made with it was accepted into the Studio333 "City Streets" show which is currently running: http://www.gdgphoto.com/ > I'm also hoping either would fit in a usable (travel) kit > (to return to that thread of a while ago; I'll be visiting nyc > for a couple of days in early december so I should be enabled > as it seems you say here :-) > > I'm thinking of > 10-17 or 12-24, DA* 16-50/2.8, DA* 50-135/2.8, 50/1.4 > a 2x converter if it works with the DA* 50-135 I don't own yet. > I'm not sure about carry-ing the FA* 80-200/2.8 around. > > anyway, so much for LBA ideas, have to see what happens, Whew, that's an awful lot of gear to truck around for "a couple of days in nyc". My last trip there I carried the Panny L1 and just the 14-50 standard lens. Got *tons* of photos with it. My next trip there I will likely carry the K10D and just the 21 and 43. Less is more... G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
