> 
> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/11/14 Wed PM 03:10:26 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Paid For
> 
> No, but he's not comparing it to 3000 prints or slides. He's comparing it to 
> 3000 frames of neg film (before the prints). Consumers are the only ones to 
> print every frame individually.
> 
> Even his typical shooting (30x36exp rolls) would cost $600 for the event. 
> That's essentially the cost of a K10D right now.
> 
> -Adam

For me, it would have been about £180.  The K10D is about £690, here.  So now 
factor in the cost of your time, sitting in front of a screen (yawn....) for 
the extra number of images.  Let's say 2000 (extra) images to assess and deal 
with.  How long will that take?  Or, to put it another way, how much effort 
will you be willing to put into that sort of assessment?  It's not all about 
the upfront cost for many people.

> 
> 
> mike wilson wrote:
> > He eliminated (many of) those in-camera.  The point is still that 3000 
> > files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides.  Produce equal numbers of 
> > the same end product before you tell me that it is cheaper.
> >> From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: 2007/11/14 Wed AM 10:15:32 GMT
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: Paid For
> >>
> >> True but then, you can eliminate the shots which are garbadge and you
> >> won't print those.
> >> Film don't let you filter those garbage shots (on a cost POV).
> >>
> >> So that's not the whole story but there's already an economy IMO.
> >>
> >> On Nov 14, 2007 10:03 AM, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Sorry Doug but that is a non-argument.  You have done two different 
> >>> things.  Would you have argued the same if you had taken a video camera 
> >>> and filled 10 DVDs with cine footage?
> >>>
> >>> Print the lot out, factor in your time at a reasonable rate, _then_ come 
> >>> back and tell us how much it cost.  I'll let you off with capital 
> >>> costs...... 8-)
> >>>> From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> Date: 2007/11/13 Tue PM 11:35:08 GMT
> >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: Paid For
> >>>> Howdy, folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, in a sense, my K10D just paid for itself and the *ist D and a
> >>>> couple of lenses, to boot.  I shot a really big three-day amateur auto
> >>>> racing event this weekend, which I do every year.  This is my second or
> >>>> third year shooting it on digital.  Only this year did I really get into
> >>>> the digital swing of things, apparently ... I managed to take nearly
> >>>> 3,000 exposures home, not even counting the ones I deleted in the camera.
> >>>>
> >>>> The last time I shot film, it cost me about US$ 20 per 24-exposure roll
> >>>> for the film, developing, and medium res scanning.  Had I been shooting
> >>>> film, last weekend would've cost me around US$ 2,500 in film and
> >>>> associated costs.  But it wouldn't have ... on film, I'd never have
> >>>> tripped the shutter that many times.  I think the most I ever shot in a
> >>>> four-day event on film was about 50 36 exposure rolls, which is 40% of
> >>>> 3,000 exposures.  And I more commonly shot around 30 rolls of 36 each in
> >>>> a 4-day event. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I finally find that I'm doing more experimenting with digital as I'm
> >>>> finally getting it through my head that there's no significant
> >>>> additional cost per exposure.  I'm taking shots I would never have tried
> >>>> before.  I'm taking several of each shot so that hopefully I'll get an
> >>>> acceptable one.  Tons of things that I'd never have been able to afford
> >>>> on film.
> >>>>
> >>>> That said, the chore of culling and post-processing 3,000 images is
> >>>> nothing to sneeze at. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> DougF (KG4LMZ)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >>>> follow the directions.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------
> >>> Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> >>> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >>> follow the directions.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
> >> ----------------------
> >> K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >> follow the directions.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
> > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to