I'm still paying off several Dslr's .LOL

I do however find my self shooting my horse shows as if I was still
using film. Just a few fences of the riders on course. Two, maybe
three if the course is set up photographer friendly.
I know several of the other people around here, machine gun and shoot
every fence, good or bad, and galloping shots as well. Thats got to
add up, cause they keep them all and try and sell them as a show day
CD.

Just can't seem to justify doing that, even for digital.

Dave

On Nov 21, 2007 12:48 PM, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations, DougF. It's nice when your work is really appreciated,
> isnt' ist?
> I recently sold a bunch of photographs to the local municipality - for use
> in publications, internet, advertisements etc. They paid enough to cover my
> K10D a couple of times :-) That's a great feeling :-)
> Regards
> Jens Bladt
>
> http://www.jensbladt.dk
> +45 56 63 77 11
> +45 23 43 85 77
> Skype: jensbladt248
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Doug
> Franklin
> Sendt: 14. november 2007 00:35
> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Emne: Paid For
>
>
>
> Howdy, folks,
>
> Well, in a sense, my K10D just paid for itself and the *ist D and a
> couple of lenses, to boot.  I shot a really big three-day amateur auto
> racing event this weekend, which I do every year.  This is my second or
> third year shooting it on digital.  Only this year did I really get into
> the digital swing of things, apparently ... I managed to take nearly
> 3,000 exposures home, not even counting the ones I deleted in the camera.
>
> The last time I shot film, it cost me about US$ 20 per 24-exposure roll
> for the film, developing, and medium res scanning.  Had I been shooting
> film, last weekend would've cost me around US$ 2,500 in film and
> associated costs.  But it wouldn't have ... on film, I'd never have
> tripped the shutter that many times.  I think the most I ever shot in a
> four-day event on film was about 50 36 exposure rolls, which is 40% of
> 3,000 exposures.  And I more commonly shot around 30 rolls of 36 each in
> a 4-day event. :-)
>
> I finally find that I'm doing more experimenting with digital as I'm
> finally getting it through my head that there's no significant
> additional cost per exposure.  I'm taking shots I would never have tried
> before.  I'm taking several of each shot so that hopefully I'll get an
> acceptable one.  Tons of things that I'd never have been able to afford
> on film.
>
> That said, the chore of culling and post-processing 3,000 images is
> nothing to sneeze at. :-)
>
> --
> Thanks,
> DougF (KG4LMZ)
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1128 - Release Date: 11/13/2007
> 11:09
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date: 11/21/2007
> 10:01
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to