The difficulty showing prints to a large audience is equally a problem. Prior to sharing them on computers, you had to either be in the same room with the person showing the print or they had to be sent to you. That could be an added cost to the film direction.
Seems like this is an indirect way of having the same old film/digital argument. Doug was really pointing out how digital has been a good thing for him. I can say that my skills have improved much faster shooting digital than they did shooting film for much the same reasons. I can see immediately the results of my choices in making the exposure and I am able to try things that I never would have on film. -- Bruce Wednesday, November 14, 2007, 4:08:44 PM, you wrote: DF> mike wilson wrote: >> [...] the things that I don't like about the trend are the >> poor resolution of the images so shown, of whatever size, >> and the lack of ability to show really large images easily. DF> I agree. The difficulty of displaying large digital images is a bother, DF> but one that will surely be dealt with by the industry over time. The DF> poor resolution of what's shown is often the fault of the person making DF> the choices about the display, though. DF> -- DF> Thanks, DF> DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
