Chuckle Graywolf Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com Blog: http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
David J Brooks wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007 1:24 PM, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least in the days of chemical prints you could move the image into the >> proper light if you were a perfectionist. > > I just move my monitor to the proper light.:-) > > Dave >> Graywolf >> Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com >> Blog: http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/ >> >> >> Bob Sullivan wrote: >>> Bruce, >>> >>> It's not just equipment, it's viewing conditions as well. >>> I see less subtle dark details here than I do in the basement. >>> Here I use my laptop with a 3 pane sliding glass door right behind me >>> - north light. >>> In the basement I'm a troglidite. Weak 60 watt lights in the ceiling >>> leaves it dark! >>> You see different things on the 20 inch LCD in the basement. >>> >>> And as before, I like the photo. The crescent moon is an eye magnet! >>> >>> Regards, Bob S. >>> >>> On Dec 1, 2007 10:33 AM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> An interesting issue brings itself forward when the voting is so open >>>> like this. There have been quite a few photos shown on this list >>>> (including a few of mine) where some of the members can't see the >>>> deeper shadows - essentially a hardware problem - could be calibration >>>> or just problem monitors. So when a photo is voted on, not only are >>>> you at the mercy of the voters, but if their monitors don't/can't show >>>> the subtle details, your image could get panned. A fairly recent one >>>> of mine shown here did just that. >>>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0137a.htm >>>> Based on the list response, I thought this one would make it. There >>>> were some responders on the list here who could not see the foreground >>>> details and thought there was too much black in the foreground. >>>> >>>> What I am getting at, is that the odds of a subtle image making it >>>> through now is even harder because of variance of equipment being used >>>> to view the photos for judging. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> Friday, November 30, 2007, 4:57:57 PM, you wrote: >>>> >>>> DJB> On Nov 30, 2007 7:51 PM, P. J. Alling >>>> DJB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> I know why they were rejected, too subtle. >>>> DJB> Meaning, crappy.:-) >>>> >>>> DJB> Dave >>>>>> David J Brooks wrote: >>>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5076840 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The other. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> any chance we can see these photos? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David J Brooks wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to >>>>>>>>> enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others >>>>>>>>> comments. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I checked the site today and they have been rejected. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At least i have my original four still there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>> above and follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> The difference between individual intelligence and group >>>>>> intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the >>>>>> Harvard University football team. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- P. J. O'Roark >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>> above and follow the directions. >>>>>> >>>> >>>> DJB> -- >>>> DJB> Equine Photography >>>> DJB> www.caughtinmotion.com >>>> DJB> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >>>> DJB> Ontario Canada >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>>> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
