On 09/12/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: >Lets see. The width of an MX (side to side) is 94% of the width of an >LX a camera that most everyone would admit is much bigger. (In fact the >LX is damn close to the same size as that old K dinosaur the K2). The >width of an ME is 96% of that of an MX, hum pretty close to the >difference in size between an MX and an LX.. While it is true that the >ME is front to back the same dimension as an MX, and from baseplate to >to the top of the Prism housing the same height (it would have to be >wouldn't it), if you look at the difference from base plate to top >plate, excluding the prism housing you'll see that the difference is >about the same as from side to side. (I don't have them right at hand so >I can't measure them exactly). This makes a huge difference in the >size, and handling. So I stand by my statement.
What a load of complete bollocks. You're on a different planet mate!! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
