Every time I read a comment like that about Live View, I shake my head. It has proven to be a feature on my L1 that I use constantly for a whole range of things I never thought about. I won't buy another DSLR without it, period.
The D300 is a fine camera. So is the E-3. So is the K10D ... hopefully the K20D or whatever they call it will come up to the standards of build materials and quality, and buffer space/speed, that the E-3 and D300 are providing. I have very high quality Pentax lenses that would make a better body happy... G On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Margus Männik wrote: > you are correct. Testing Olympus vs. Nikon for our local computer/ > photo > magazine. K10D was for mu own comparision and reference... > Shortly I would say - if someone would offer me to change my Pentax > set > to Nikon D300 set (body + similar lenses to what I have, NO additional > payment) - I would agree. D300 is a really good photographing > machine. > Though not 2.5 times (as an approximate price difference) better than > K10D, so I wouldn't sell my Pentax and buy Nikon. > Olympus E-3, despite the double price compared to K10D, didn't impress > me at all. It may have it's strong points, but you probably have to > be a > true Olympus fan to find 'em. LiveView? Well, I have a compact camera > for that. Picture quality? As long as we are talking about print sizes > up to A4 (12"x8"), E-3 is definitely not better than K10D. Tomorrow I > should get a set of A3 prints, maybe in these I can see more visible > differences. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
