Mark Roberts wrote: > >> > I'm sure we're not the only ones who have deferred purchases until the situation > is clarified. > > >I hope it will be a 4 to 5Mp, with a focal-multiplier of 1.3 or 1.4. > >If that is offered for US $3000 to $3500 with other specs comparable to the MZ-D, > >I will get one for sure ... >
I haven't deferred any purchases because of that. In fact, I bought the MZ-S after Pentax announce they had axed the MZ-D project. and if I can afford a Limited 31 mm. in the near future, I'll buy it. My "digital needs" are covered by a Minolta film scanner a modest flatbed scanner, an Artec AS6E. I would only consider a digital SLR if it were full frame, and when it is in my price bracket. I know that both things won't happen in the near future, but I am not in a hurry. I would add to the conditions i've said before, a decent image quality and of course, a K-mount that accepts all my lenses. 6 Mpixels is not enough in my opinion. I understand that PJs and some other people may need the kind of digital SLR's we see in the market now, and then some people also feel the urge to keep pace with the latest technology only for the sake of it, but in my case I still feel that my film cameras are much better than those expensive toys. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zaragoza (Aragon) - Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
