> > From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/12/31 Mon PM 04:01:49 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Interesting ULA. > > William Robb wrote: > > I doubt very much if it is enforcable. > > > > http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4326/camera-test-fujifilm-finepix-is-1-a-narrowly-defined-user-licensing-agreement-page2.html > > > This is probably more of a CYA thing on Fuji's part. As far as I'm > concerned, if I buy one it's mine. What I do with it is none of Fuji's > business. If I break the law or cause someone harm with it, then either > the State or the victim or both can attempt to exact some sort of > retribution. Fuji has this nonsense in their EULA so that if I use the > IR capabilities of their "police" camera to cause harm to someone else, > it becomes difficult for me to point a blaming finger at Fuji.
Do Colt and S&W have EULAs? ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
