No but then again Congress passed a special dispensation for them a few years ago. I always thought a person's wrongdoing was their responsibility. But not according to the Mayors of Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and a number of other cities in the US. Based on their logic if a murder was committed with a claw hammer the Stanly Works would be responsible for damages.
mike wilson wrote: >> From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2007/12/31 Mon PM 04:01:49 GMT >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Interesting ULA. >> >> William Robb wrote: >> >>> I doubt very much if it is enforcable. >>> >>> http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4326/camera-test-fujifilm-finepix-is-1-a-narrowly-defined-user-licensing-agreement-page2.html >>> >>> >> This is probably more of a CYA thing on Fuji's part. As far as I'm >> concerned, if I buy one it's mine. What I do with it is none of Fuji's >> business. If I break the law or cause someone harm with it, then either >> the State or the victim or both can attempt to exact some sort of >> retribution. Fuji has this nonsense in their EULA so that if I use the >> IR capabilities of their "police" camera to cause harm to someone else, >> it becomes difficult for me to point a blaming finger at Fuji. >> > > Do Colt and S&W have EULAs? > > > ----------------------------------------- > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > -- I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world -- Anonymous -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
