INteresting, I would have said the 17-50 is as good as the 28-75, certainly the two examples I've had the chance to try were. (It also does well in comparison to the Nikon 17-55, not quite the equal, but 1/3 the cost).
-Adam On 1/6/08, Amita Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nor is the Tamron as good as its 28-75mm brother. I had the Sigma > 18-50mm f/2.8 in K mount, and it worked just fine, although I didn't > love it. > > On Jan 6, 2008 6:49 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Tamron 17-50 isn't available in K mount. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
