Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. If you look at the roof of the building in the background, it's got a curve to it.
Walter Hamler wrote: > Gee Scott, looks pretty good to me as far as composition. I don't see > any distortions that jump out at me making the lens choice obvious. > I had a 35mm for mine as well and it was my favorite lens for other > than weddings/portraits. It really is a great lens for wide coverage > when you need it, and a lot sharper than the 45mm. > > Walt > > On 1/11/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's >> apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this >> photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what the >> exposure was. >> >> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#5154394198121539746 >> >> Feedback is appreciated. Ego strokes are cherished. >> >> -- >> Scott Loveless >> http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
