Thanks Len. I saw a some new Epsons in the store. I was intrigued by the 1280 and 2000P (not that I can afford them right now). I really like the idea of being able to make a borderless print.
In general, I just make mediocre prints of any size. If I wanted to really display one I'd go get it professionally done. Re: Photoshop. Not working in photography as a full time profession, I find I fall victim to the "Learn only as much as you need to know to get it done syndrome". It's hard to be an expert when it's hard to find the time. Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paris, Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:47 AM Subject: RE: The true cost of "free" digital? > Tom C. said: > > I find that I usually need to print more than once or twice, before I get > something decent. So it's sort of like printing everything anyway by the > time I get done. I have one of those two-year old antiquated Epson 800's. > > Anybody want to make a blanket statement about how much better printers have > become since two years ago and how easy it is to get a "photo quality" print > out at any size (large or small) that rivals the samples they show in the > stores? > > Or is it still just as hard and time-consuming? > > Tom C. > ----- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
