In a message dated 11/21/01 9:07:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> He says that without much exception his major architectural clients are not > happy with the amount of info captured by 16 MP digital backs when a good > 4x5 film plate can get more than 64 MP when scanned if they want a digital > product. When I speak about medium format digital, I mean (or meant to say) film to drum scanned medium format. I was astonished at the size of the files when I had my 6x7 negs scanned the first time. They eat up ZIP 250 disks. "Unless of course you are shooting in a field like PJ in 35mm format where a loss in info capture isn't important due to the media result it is used in." Agreed. Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
