aimcompute wrote: > > I find that I usually need to print more than once or twice, before I get > something decent. So it's sort of like printing everything anyway by the > time I get done. I have one of those two-year old antiquated Epson 800's. > > Anybody want to make a blanket statement about how much better printers have > become since two years ago and how easy it is to get a "photo quality" print > out at any size (large or small) that rivals the samples they show in the > stores? > > Or is it still just as hard and time-consuming?
I've never seriously printed photography on an Ink Jet. One thing that has occurred to me, though: The recent (4+ years and counting?) spate of color inkjet printers are junk compared to some of the old ones, which were actually spec'd at decent duty cycles. I would NOT buy a 49 dollar printer, not from Epson, or IBM, or HP, or Canon, or nobody. I actually like things that will work for a decade or so. -Lon - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
