I've had great results with a pano I did in Denali a few years ago. Took 6 jpeg images (vertical orientation) around 2 MB each. stitched them together getting a 54.8 MB file. I the had it printed 3' X 1 '. The detail is outstanding. Definitely has more left if I want to go larger. Web posting doesn't do it justice.
Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - The Stand > >> >> Something I've been playing with in an attempt to get decent >> resolution from >> digital is multiple stitched exposures. >> This shot >> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/pages/Arch1Panorama1.html >> is a dozen exposures pasted together. No big deal on a computer >> screen, but >> the 16x24 inch print that rolled of my Epson does rival large >> format for >> visual appeal, though I have a hunch that I would still prefer a >> wet print >> made from 4x5 FP-4+. > > Looks superb at web size. Would love to see your print. Hope you > bring it to GFM. > >> I'm kind of a contrary person that way. > > No, not you!:-). > Me neither:-)). > Pal >> >> William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
