----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Why is Kodak Gold Max evil?
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, William Robb wrote:
>
> > Please note, at the moment, the only Fuji films I like better
> > than the competing Kodak films are the Superia 400/800 vs Max
> > 400/800.
> > Not a bad record for Kodak actually.
>
> What do you think of Royal Gold 200 and 400? I've heard that they tend to
> print too warm, but they're nice and cheap, so that's a plus. :)
And how about the Supra films? Cheaper still... I really like the 400
and 100...
Isaac
>
> chris
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
