Mafud, Do you think, perhaps, that it's KODAK's game you are playing? I say this in half-jest, half-seriousness.
Do you think that KODAK knows they are the largest, greatest brand recognition, most heavily advertised film mfr. in the world? Do you think that KODAK would release a "shoddy KODAK product" knowingly, or on accident? Do you think it's because they view customer loyalty more as an asset, or something to be taken advantage of? I'm not arguing whether KODAK produces ANY good products. I'm just saying we shouldn't believe it just because KODAK says it. We shouldn't believe POP Photography just because they say it and because KODAK advertises in it. I would say the same thing about Fuji as well. Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: Re: Why is Kodak Gold Max evil? > In a message dated 11/20/01 7:37:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I bet it took Robb's site to make Kodak sit up and notice. > > > > Actually, it was the screams from we loyal KODAK users, especially we KODAK > (POE) Pros who tend to see any shoddy KODAK product as reflecting on the > entire breed of KODAK products. > And yes, KODAK ~does~ listen to its "pro" groups and their members. Whether > ROBB is a KODAK POE member I don't know. > > Mafud > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
