He doesn't say he only used it a little. He said I've never seen this camera, (or words to that effect). He panned the camera without ever actually ever using it. He's also given glowing reviews to Nikon products that he's lever laid eyes on let alone hands on. His theories of photography are questionable, his methods are shoddy, and his mother dresses him funny.
Bob W wrote: >> No but he claimed to get a pile of hate mail over his "hands >> on" review >> of the Pentax *ist-D or maybe it was the Ds, I can't remember >> which and >> can't be bothered to read his reviews section to find out.. >> > > ...isn't that rather a Ken-ish approach? > > I've just had a look at the review here: > http://www.kenrockwell.com/pentax/istD.htm > > and I must say it seems perfectly reasonable, albeit rather thin. He > gives the standard set of facts about the camera that you can get > anywhere, and says "I have only used it a little. It's a perfectly > swell camera. I will presume image quality is the same as the other > real DSLRs like the Nikon D100 and Canon 10D [...] By all means > consider this. It should be much better than any non-SLR". > > It's somewhat useless as a review, but he says he used it, but only a > little. I can see no reason for this to generate hate mail, or indeed > any reaction other than 'so what?'. > > -- > Bob > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of P. J. Alling >> Sent: 26 January 2008 09:42 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: K20D Kenny boy style >> >> No but he claimed to get a pile of hate mail over his "hands >> on" review >> of the Pentax *ist-D or maybe it was the Ds, I can't remember >> which and >> can't be bothered to read his reviews section to find out.. >> Anyway he >> doesn't seem to respond to criticism well. He doesn't seem to >> understand what a hands on review is, that you actually have >> to handle >> the equipment, not critique the marketing materials. I've seen him >> quoted as an authoritative source on other forums which ticks >> me off no >> end. The guy is total a hack, (now I may be a hack but I >> don't pretend >> not to be, and I certainly don't have a website with a paypal >> donation >> setup to share dubious my expertise). >> >> Jack Davis wrote: >> >>> I wonder if he reads the PDML and as a result, is >>> >> maladjusted enough to >> >>> publicly demean a camera system out of frustration at the >>> >> criticism he >> >>> sees. >>> >>> Jack >>> > > > -- I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world -- Anonymous -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
