To me those comments comprise an insipid ill considered summation. One
which ignores its forward technology and, seemingly, is designed to
trash its image by lumping it with lesser performers.

Jack

--- Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > No but he claimed to get a pile of hate mail over his "hands 
> > on" review 
> > of the Pentax *ist-D or maybe it was the Ds, I can't remember 
> > which and 
> > can't be bothered to read his reviews section to find out..  
> 
> ...isn't that rather a Ken-ish approach?
> 
> I've just had a look at the review here:
> http://www.kenrockwell.com/pentax/istD.htm
> 
> and I must say it seems perfectly reasonable, albeit rather thin. He
> gives the standard set of facts about the camera that you can get
> anywhere, and says "I have only used it a little. It's a perfectly
> swell camera. I will presume image quality is the same as the other
> real DSLRs like the Nikon D100 and Canon 10D [...] By all means
> consider this. It should be much better than any non-SLR".
> 
> It's somewhat useless as a review, but he says he used it, but only a
> little. I can see no reason for this to generate hate mail, or indeed
> any reaction other than 'so what?'.
> 
> --
>  Bob
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > Behalf Of P. J. Alling
> > Sent: 26 January 2008 09:42
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: K20D Kenny boy style
> > 
> > No but he claimed to get a pile of hate mail over his "hands 
> > on" review 
> > of the Pentax *ist-D or maybe it was the Ds, I can't remember 
> > which and 
> > can't be bothered to read his reviews section to find out..  
> > Anyway he 
> > doesn't seem to respond to criticism well.  He doesn't seem to 
> > understand what a hands on review is, that you actually have 
> > to handle 
> > the equipment, not critique the marketing materials.  I've seen him
> 
> > quoted as an authoritative source on other forums which ticks 
> > me off no 
> > end.  The guy is total a hack, (now I may be a hack but I 
> > don't pretend 
> > not to be, and I certainly don't have a website with a paypal 
> > donation 
> > setup to share dubious my expertise). 
> > 
> > Jack Davis wrote:
> > > I wonder if he reads the PDML and as a result, is 
> > maladjusted enough to
> > > publicly demean a camera system out of frustration at the 
> > criticism he
> > > sees.
> > >
> > > Jack
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> and follow the directions.
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to