William Robb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> > Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera depreciate as well? >> >> Yup. But at some point, the depreciation stops but the camera >> is still useful. Witness the number of 30 plus year-old PENTAX >> horses that get hitched up every day. We probably won't be able >> to say the same for digital cameras. >> Some of the old PENTAX warhorses can cost you more today than >> any of them cost new. Let's see digital say that! > >Your presumption that a 5 year old digital camera is not useful >is false though. Just because a newer, faster, whatever piece of >equipment hits the market, it does not render the predecessor >useless.
Hey! You're in trouble now: There's a multi-billion-dollar-a-year industry out there that didn't want you to figure that out! -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
