Yes, the 10-17 only a good choice if you want fisheye distortion. If you plan on correcting most of your shots to rectilinear, you're much better off with the DA 12-24. Paul On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> John Celio wrote: > >>> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf >> >> Oh sweet! 15mm is a bit wide for me, but I'd like to see how it does >> compared to the older 14mm. Personally, I still want the 10-17 >> Fisheye > for >> my ultra-wide needs. > > The 10-17 fisheye is a lot of fun, but the image quality is less than > I'd like. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
