The 200mm prime should be quite a bit lighter.
Cotty wrote:
>> DA*200/2.8.
>>
>
> Forgive my ignorance (and it is great), but why would anyone want a
> prime lens at this length when a 70 or 80 - 200 2.8 zoom is available
> (assuming of course optical performance of the zoom matches up to the prime) ?
>
> I can understand a 300 or 400 at 2.8, but not a 200.
>
>
>
--
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati.
A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated.
When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world
-- Anonymous
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
