When I had my Canon gear, I had the 100/2, 70-200/4L and the 300/4L IS lenses. I found myself preferring the primes most of the time, and it wasn't because of the image quality or focal length. The prime lenses just let me work the way I want to. I had the 200/2.8L in my sights ...
Godfrey On Feb 14, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Cotty wrote: >> DA*200/2.8. > > Forgive my ignorance (and it is great), but why would anyone want a > prime lens at this length when a 70 or 80 - 200 2.8 zoom is available > (assuming of course optical performance of the zoom matches up to > the prime) ? > > I can understand a 300 or 400 at 2.8, but not a 200. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
