Nice comparison shots, gives a good idea of what we can look forward to. Read the entire thread and now I remember why I don't read there much.
Joseph Tainter wrote: > Over on dpreview I've posted links to comparison shots of the K10D at > ISO 1600 and the K20D at 1600, 3200, and 6400. > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=26892298 > > The K20D looks like it will give pretty nice results at ISO 1600. Above > that one would want to experiment with noise reduction, either in-camera > (there are several grades) or in post-production. In time I will see how > the camera performs at ISO 2400. > > The files are big: 42.5 mb for RAW images processed to TIFFs. That's why > I had to upload these as jpegs. The images all looked better as TIFFs > than they do as JPEGs. > > All-in-all this is an improvement in the high ISO range, which is a > major reason I wanted the K20D. > > Joe > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
