If I see it correctly the K20 has little or no purple fringing (CCD bleeding). That would be nice. I think I need one very badly to satisfy my occasional pixelpeeping addiction...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Over on dpreview I've posted links to comparison shots of the K10D at > ISO 1600 and the K20D at 1600, 3200, and 6400. > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=26892298 > > The K20D looks like it will give pretty nice results at ISO 1600. Above > that one would want to experiment with noise reduction, either in-camera > (there are several grades) or in post-production. In time I will see how > the camera performs at ISO 2400. > > The files are big: 42.5 mb for RAW images processed to TIFFs. That's why > I had to upload these as jpegs. The images all looked better as TIFFs > than they do as JPEGs. > > All-in-all this is an improvement in the high ISO range, which is a > major reason I wanted the K20D. > > Joe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Toine http://www.repiuk.nl -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
