I've never really noticed any back/front focusing issues, but you folks
are making me paranoid.  Is there a good kind of shot for testing this? 
I'm thinking of using the 50 1.4 and 135 2.8, wide open, to take a
portrait and using the central sensor to focus on one eye?  Will this be
a good indicator or would other conditions be better?

>>> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/25/2008 3:53 PM >>>
A better way of saying what I was trying to....
> 
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/02/25 Mon AM 11:26:58 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: K20D & back focus
> 
> I think it's more likely that the sensor's focus plane is more  
> accurate rather than tighter than that of film. The focal point is  
> the focal point. And since film is somewhat curved, it can never be 

> totally accurate.
> Paul
> On Feb 25, 2008, at 3:58 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> 
> >
> >>
> >> From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> Reading the promo literature on the K20D, I noticed a new
feature.
> >> The camera has the ability to store adjustments for backfocus (or
> >> forward) for 20 lenses.
> >> The claim is that all the DA lenses are fine, but others may need 

> >> adjusting.
> >>
> >> Any ideas on why this might be?
> >> Do some lenses transmit more of the right wavelength light for  
> >> focusing?
> >> I am puzzled as to the physics/mechanics of this.
> >
> > I am beginning to suspect that the focus plane required for sensors
 
> > is much tighter than that for film and that lenses that would have 

> > been fine on replaceable medium do not now have the quality control
 
> > required for good focus.  Combined with an uncertain condition due 

> > to age and wear and tear, it may be that many lenses do not have  
> > the ability to focus properly on the sensor.  This will of course, 

> > mean that it is individual lenses (although there may be model  
> > traits) that require to either be adjusted to suit the sensor or  
> > have the sensor placed into a suitable position.  As the sensor can
 
> > be easily adjusted to compensate that seems to be the logical  
> > suggestion, rather than a major service on each lens - which would 

> > then only make them suitable for one particular body.  I'm not sure
 
> > which is Mo' and which is the mountain in this scenario.
> >
> > I also still can't work out why one lens should appear to focus  
> > properly in the viewfinder yet not on the sensor and another  
> > focuses fine on both.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email 
> > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected] 
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 

> > and follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected] 
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email 
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected] 
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47c32dc069101956845059!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to