Hello Boris, This is the basic way I determine:
The method of determination of peer rejection vs. judges is based on speed of rejection. For the past couple of months, the judges have been taking 1-3 weeks to reject. Peer rejections are mostly within a few days. So if something has sat there for a long time (more than a week) and eventually gets rejected, that is most likely a judge. It is also easier to tell if there are several submissions. So an example would be that 10 are submitted. 7 of the are rejected within two days. The remaining 3 sit there for 3 weeks and then are all rejected at once. This would indicate that the 7 were peer rejections and the 3 were judge rejections. Makes sense, no? -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, March 1, 2008, 7:35:52 AM, you wrote: BL> Bruce, could you please tell me how to discover whether the photo was BL> rejected by peer voting or by gallery judges? BL> My hat's off before you for what you did! BL> As for your ramble - you're absolutely right. I mean - unless one by BL> conscious choice engages in computer graphic where the initial image BL> comes through photographic process of either digital or analog kind, one BL> is most definitely not in the trend. BL> Boris BL> Bruce Dayton wrote: >> Well, I did the unpardonable - I took down all 53 of my photos. I >> had two in the collection. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
