Same question to you Paul...
Could you tell visually, before correctiion that you had a focus issue? (I'm 
meaning before checking focus with a target)
If so, can you now see an improvement? (when shooting something other than 
the target)

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: K20D & AF calibration data


> So far, of four lenses tested, my largest derivation was the FA50 at
> -4. I had a couple pluses and a couple minuses.
> Paul
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>
>> By using Tim Jackson's chart (thanks Rick for reminding me that!)
>> I've got
>> the following calibration settings for the K20D:
>>
>> DA 12-24 = -6
>> DA 16-45 = 0
>> DA* 50-135 = -3
>>
>> FA 31 = -10 (and it's not enough!)
>> FA 50/1.7 = -10
>> FA 50/1.4 = -10
>> FA* 85/1.4 = -9
>> FA 24-90 = -6
>>
>> F* 300/4.5 = -4
>>
>> So my lenses are all front focusing, and not a single one is back
>> focusing.
>> Or maybe my K20D is acting that way.
>> It will be interesting to know how much variation one can find with
>> the same
>> combos made up of different items.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dario


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to