Unlike Safari, FF isn't yet colour space aware.

I posted these some time ago comparing FF2 & FF3alpha

FF2 (~240kb):

<http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1123/1459003391_e188a4bee1_o.jpg>

FF3alpha (~250kb)

<http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1331/1459005903_8e3c267108_o.jpg>

Your best bet is to assume everyone is using a non colour space aware
browser & just stick with sRGB for web images.

Cheers,

Dave

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Marcus A. Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be slightly off-topic. But maybe someone here can help.
>
>  Something I don't get at all is all that color space thing. I read a
>  little about it and decided to just go with the Lightroom default of
>  ProPhoto RGB, but I am now running into problems.
>
>  The symptoms:
>
>  sRGB, Adobe RGB and ProPhoto RGB Jpegs exported from LR will all look
>  identical in Safari 3.1 on OS X 10.5. They all look exactly like the
>  original looks in LR. But they all look different from each other in
>  Firefox, and in FF also look different from the original in LR.
>
>  If I resize and resample them using GDlib (in a php script), the
>  resulting Jpegs will look like the original Jpegs do in Firefox, which
>  is different from what the original looks like in LR. But at least it
>  is consistent in Firefox. But in Safari, the resized images will now
>  also look like they do in Firefox, which is different from the
>  original Jpegs.
>
>  I have put up an example: http://ntony.codewut.de/temp/test.html
>
>  If you look at it in Safari and Firefox, you will see what I mean.
>  Maybe someone can explain what is happening there? How do you deal
>  with that?

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to