Scott Loveless wrote: > Adam Maas wrote: >> The *istD. Overly small grip makes the handling inferior to the later >> bodies. Slow write speeds and the necessity to drop out of shooting >> mode to change ISO, WB or image quality settings comprimise it as a >> camera as well. >> > I think I'm odd-man-out here. While the K10D was plenty comfy, I found > the *istD much more pleasant to hold.
I don't think you're odd (well, about this, anyway...) I prefer the feel if the ist-D to the K10D. It's a slight preference, though; not enough to bother me. What *did* bother me was the control layout of the MZ-S. I *loved* the overall ergonomics, but missed the dual-control-wheel setup of the PZ-1p (and ist-D and K10d). If the MZ-S had that control setup I *never* would have sold it. Ever. It would have been my "film camera to keep forever". -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
