On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2008, at 16:01, John Francis wrote:
> > The DL was basically the same as the DS, but the original D was  
> > different.
> > Quite apart from the fact that it took CF cards, not SD media, it  
> > also had
> > the two-wheel control interface found on the PZ-1p (and now the K10D/ 
> > K20D).
> >
> 
> After getting the K10D, I amused myself by going and looking at the  
> DPReview review of the original ist-D - it's amazing how similar in  
> design the two cameras are.  With the exception of the weather  
> sealing, SR, larger screen and 10 megapixel sensor, the two cameras  
> are actually quite similar.
> 
>   -Charles

Oh, I agree :-)   That's why I, among many other D owners here, waited
for the K10D to come along before purchasing a new body.  But then I
love the two-wheel ergonomics I had on the PZ-1p; although I did get
the MZ-S when it came out for the improved auto-focus I never really
took to it, and continued to use the PZ-1p a lot of the time.

What I like best about the K10D, though, is the additional shooting
modes (promoting ISO almost to a par with shutter speed & aperture) -
an unexpected bonus from a feature I initially mostly discounted.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to