mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mike Johnston wrote: >> I disagree. Sometimes, it CAN hurt. Trivial but common example: a >> photographer makes the decision to throw the background in a portrait out of >> focus. Less information; better picture. > >I disagree, too. _Not_ less information - the same amount of >information presented in a different way.
We're looking at different meanings of "information" here. In the technical (computer) sense, there's just as much "information" in out-of-focus parts of an image as in the sharp parts, but as far as a human being looking at it is concerned, there's less information there. -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
