Hi, Mark Roberts wrote:
> We're looking at different meanings of "information" here. In the technical > (computer) sense, there's just as much "information" in out-of-focus parts of an > image as in the sharp parts, but as far as a human being looking at it is > concerned, there's less information there. I think I am still going to disagree with you..... Just because it's not the information one expects to see, doesn't mean that there is less of it. In the given example, there will seen a lot of information about colour shades as opposed to shape information. The shape information is there, just not in the form expected. I realise that this is pedantry but, as pedants do, I think it is quite important. It is one of the basic tenets of art that there is more to it than meets the eye...... mike - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
