I too have found the FA 80-320 to be a lot of lens for the money. It's my walkaround lens for the zoo:-). Really. Paul On May 2, 2008, at 12:17 PM, John Francis wrote: > > I traded my M 80-200 for an FA 80-320 (literally, albeit indirectly). > I've never regretted it. Mind you, if I want an 80-200 I've still > got one in my kit. > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:50:50PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote: >> Yes, I'm using the FA 80-320 as well and have been impressed with >> it's >> performance. I seem to recall a few other list members singing its >> praises from time to time. >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Brian >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Brian Walters >> Western Sydney, Australia >> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 01 May 2008 18:11:23 -0600, "Bran Everseeking" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> On Thu, 01 May 2008 23:42:36 +0200 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher) wrote: >>> >>>> What about the ubiquitous F and FA xx-200 or xx-300 mm lenses? Any >>>> other suggestions? 3rd party lenses? >>> >>> The FA 80-320 treats me well excepting the rotating front >>> element. I >>> understand this lens has a variation in quality as well. >>> >>> Bran >>> >>> -- >> -- >> >> >> -- >> http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
