Bob, their photos were skimmed off Flicker, who says you'll be asked?

> If Google takes a photo from space of Cotty lying naked in his garden,
> and this software merges it with a picture taken a couple of years ago
> of the previous owners lying naked in the next spot, what will people
> think they're seeing?
Now that's a very disturbing image...


Bob W wrote:
> It's very impressive technically, despite terms like 'visual photos'
> and 'visual cameras', but I don't think you need to be disturbed. I
> don't expect you'll be forced to contribute your pictures to it
> against your will (they are still copyright after all), and your
> pictures' intended use and context remains as long as you preserve it.
>
> The presenter didn't mention anything about time, which is an
> important part of how we see a photo. A picture represents its subject
> matter in a small fraction of a second, but the composite of Notre
> Dame is not built from pictures taken in the same fraction of a
> second, so it represents something that never existed. At best it's an
> approximation of Notre Dame (as any picture is, of course). I wonder
> how it deals with times when there's scaffolding on the building, or
> rainy days versus sunny days, or pictures taken in 1943 versus
> pictures taken this morning.
>
> If Google takes a photo from space of Cotty lying naked in his garden,
> and this software merges it with a picture taken a couple of years ago
> of the previous owners lying naked in the next spot, what will people
> think they're seeing?
>
> It should raise some interesting questions.
>
> Bob
>
>   
>> I'm finding this somewhat disturbing.  Your hard won 
>> photographs are now 
>> nothing more than data.  Your intended use and context is
>>     
> forgotten...
>   
>> Maybe that doesn't disturb anyone else...
>>
>> Bong Manayon wrote:
>>     
>>> Here's another link that caught my attention...
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/05/ted-2007-microsoft-sead
>> ragon-and-photosynth/
>>     
>>> "Metaverse...!?!"
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
>   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to