On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:01 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/nude-photographs-revolting-rudd/2008/05/23/1211183044543.html> > <http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=567968> >
Interesting. The newspaper has a poll asking their readership if it's pornography or not, yet other than one very OOF partial photo behind Rudd's back, there are no images of the exhibit anywhere that I can find in the story. I wonder how they expect their readers to make an informed decision? Anyway, taking non-sexual nudes of anyone at any age does not strike me as pornography. Since the cops and politicoes are so motivated to protect our children, I'd really like them to shut down these sorts of things that sexualize our young girls: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k71rG0o02BM&NR=1 They do a hell of a lot more harm than anything Rudd's done, IMHO! cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
