You are right Frank. THAT is obscene! Dan M
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:10 AM, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:01 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> <http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/nude-photographs-revolting-rudd/2008/05/23/1211183044543.html> >> <http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=567968> >> > > Interesting. The newspaper has a poll asking their readership if it's > pornography or not, yet other than one very OOF partial photo behind > Rudd's back, there are no images of the exhibit anywhere that I can > find in the story. I wonder how they expect their readers to make an > informed decision? > > Anyway, taking non-sexual nudes of anyone at any age does not strike > me as pornography. Since the cops and politicoes are so motivated to > protect our children, I'd really like them to shut down these sorts of > things that sexualize our young girls: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k71rG0o02BM&NR=1 > > They do a hell of a lot more harm than anything Rudd's done, IMHO! > > cheers, > frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
