No, there hasn't been stock in several months. K10D's were still available when K100D Super stock ran out in Canada.
-Adam On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't the K100D Super still being offered there? > > It's still on sale and being advertised here - it's even still listed on > the Pentax Aust (aka CR Kennedy) web site (maybe Kennedy has lots of old > stock). > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:30:25 -0400, "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> If I was buying a sub-$1k body I would. The Sony most likely, or the >> Nikon D80 (which is comparable to the K10D, but costs about the same >> as the K200D). >> >> The thing is I'm a Pentax fan. I'd really like to see them with a >> competitive body in the core of the marketplace. The K20D is a great >> body and competitive at its pricepoint, but the K200D is not, >> especially since it offers less camera for more money than the K10D >> did. >> >> -Adam >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > whine, whine, whine.... >> > Buy something else! >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Not here it isn't. It's about $200 over the Sony A200 kit at base >> >> price ($850 vs $650), and the Sony an be had on sale under $500 on >> >> occasion. The Sony offers everything the K200D does except AA >> >> batteries and sealing and adds a usable buffer, faster AF and better >> >> batteries. >> >> >> >> The K200D's buffer spec is so crippled that I can't consider it >> >> anything other than an entry level camera. Every other camera on the >> >> market except teh Panasonic DMC-L10 has a greatly superior buffer, >> >> even el-cheapos like the Nikon D40 (9 shot RAW) >> >> >> >> -Adam >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> K200D is competitive IMO although this isn't a real low-end body: >> >>> 490€ >> >>> is OK to me. >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> The masses? probably not, they'll be set with the 18-55 and 50-200. >> >>>> But they'll likely not buy Pentax right now since Pentax lacks a >> >>>> competitive sub-$1K camera. Semi-serious photogs? certainly. It's a >> >>>> longer-range replacement for the well-liked 16-45/4. Nikon's similar >> >>>> range 18-70 and 16-85VR are also very popular, as is Canon's 17-85IS. >> >>>> >> >>>> This will be the main option for Pentax users upgrading from the >> >>>> 18-55. I could also see Pentax using it as the kit with the K20D and >> >>>> later mid/high range bodies. >> >>>> >> >>>> -Adam >> >>>> >> > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
