A lot of the pro photographers I know own a Leica M8. Very few use it.
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No argument from me about those points, William.  The Leica seems
> ill-conceived for its traditional purpose.  As others have said, the new
> purpose of a Leica is as bling, or investment on the collectors market.  A
> camera's prestige value should flow downwards from the pointy end of
> professional usage, but Leica apparently seeks to redefine prestige as
> flowing upwards from the lowest common denominator of "how much cash can we
> screw out of our wealthy clientele who don't know shit from clay".
> 
> When Godfrey points out that many pro-photographers are successfully using
> M8s, I am reminded that many pro-photographers could produce art from a
> Diana.  That's no great defense for the Leica, it's praise for those
> photographers. 
> 
> Regards,
> Anthony Farr
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > William Robb
> > Sent: Friday, 13 June 2008 11:29 AM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: [OT] Leica M8 Field Test
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anthony Farr"
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Leica M8 Field Test
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > I'm not talking about you of course, Mark, because I don't recall you
> ever
> > > bitching and moaning about the onerous burden of using a modern camera.
> > 
> > The guy isn't bitching about using a modern camera, he is bitching that
> his modern
> > Leica is
> > fundamentally useless in any of the parameters that a photographer uses to
> > determine usability,
> > and doesn't perform as well as cameras five or more years old.
> > The camera needs to be disassembled to check if there is a memory card in
> it.
> > Neither auto nor maual white balance seems reliable for giving consistent
> white
> > balance.
> > The camera is useless to him (and honestly to most anyone else) because
> the
> > images at ISO's
> > above 640 were too noisy.
> > Auto exposure was unreliable.
> > Furthermore, an *istD outperforms it's buffer size and write speeds.
> > 
> > In November 2006, I wrote about the M8
> > "They (Leica) just bought themselves a coffin and a gun.
> > Bye-Bye Leica.
> > 
> > It appears that in a year and a half, they haven't corrected any of the
> problems with
> > the
> > camera. That is absolutely unacceptable for a 10K piece of equipment.
> > 
> > William Robb
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow
> > the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to