Pedantic perhaps but, nevertheless, correct. P4 is correct, P-IV is understandable, P1V is nonsense.
Keep the faith, Len --- -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Computer Upgrade True, I didn't check Intel's nomenclature to find the preferred abbreviation, but that was not the gist of my post. I was addressing the use of P1V rather than P-IV or P4 or any other permutation of that name. My point was that ~either~ all Roman ~or~ all Arabic numeral should be used exclusively of the other. I suspected that the correspondent who asked what a P1V was might have known it was a Pentium 4 processsor if its name was not confused by mixed numeral styles. As I wrote, it was a purely pedantic observation, and rather frivolous as well. Regards, Anthony Farr - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
